Відео

? you mean the Tilta float? I attached a flowcine mechanical gimbal inverted on the top… it is out of production but don't be to sad…it doesn't work that great.

Yes... thats the name of the Kubrick Members YT profile.... Thank you so much for your support Dimakop. We salute you!

Glad you do Alex. Thanks for watching!!!

Totally... I love that cinematography is such a self revealing art form. All you need to do is look hard. You can lean all of Finchers tricks by just watching.

the 50mm f/1.4 ia not thoriated... the 55 /f1.2 aspherical on the other hand is a real bad boy and one of the most radioactive lenses ever.

Totally our pleasure man... appreciate your kindness. Thanks for watching

Thanks man... very happy you enjoy our work... and Finchers, too ;-) nice to have you around!

Danke Fredi!!! Hast Du selbst gefunden???!!! Wusste nicht das Du abonniert bis.

Crazy is my middle name... and David Finchers first name

So happy to inspire you! The best thing one can possibly do. Thank you for being around

Glad it was helpful! Love to be your prof ;-)

Because they used "Anamorfake" and a comparison is interesting... of course, only for those interested in the subject.

Thanks man.... appreciated!

Thanks a lot and it's our pleasure. Nothing against my heroes Darius and Jeff but admittedly, new technology used in interesting ways helped messerschmidt to craft something different that would have been impossible to do on film. "Better" is always a matter of taste and should not be argued. In this context, the cinematography of the Killer is surly more interesting and easier to recreate

Thanks a lot!!! Appreciate your kindness

I don't get what the big deal about diamonds!

As viewers we associate certain looks with specific types of production because we are used to them through decades of watching films made with them - some technologies are associated with expensive high quality cinema, sometimes despite being hacks. 24 fps and anamorphic are two examples of this. 60fps looks objectively better than 24fps, but our brains tell us it is "cheap video". Anamorphic is a hack to work around limited film size and spherical has a more accurate projection, but our brains tell us anamorphic is "expensive movie". So even after almost two decades of digital filming and now with modern wide sensors most viewers will still instinctively prefer a film with anamorphic artifacts over a film without them - most of them won't even be able to tell you why. Perhaps this will change in a few more decades with a generation of viewers that are used to expensive productions with 60fps, HDR, UHD, spherical lenses and portrait mode frames.

​ yes to all that … but. let me expand on that. After a decade of the possibility to easily create a "better" image by upping spatial and temporal resolution… and countless attempts to bring that to main stream media, habits have significantly changed. Young audience don't have the same associations any more… some might have never watched interlaced footage on a CRT. This show an advantage of 24fps and less "sharp" image beyond viewing habits … for cinematic purposes of course. The visual mechanics seem to work very different and high FPS and detail sucks the poetry out of the image. The brain seems to switch from memory/dream state into reality mode if stops to fill the holes. With cinemas 24fps we seem to have arrived at an ideal frame rate… to induce that “magic”. Anamorphic seems to do kind of the same trick with spatial quality.

You are very welcome! Thank you for being around

Adrian.... you are just to nice and generous. Thank you so much for making this possible! You almost made me cry.... if every 1000 viewer would be of your caliber, this might be somewhat profitable. Thank you again! The red pill.... or the mushroom.... whatever it takes to go deeper into that rabbit hole, we shall fear nothing as long as you are with us. The division salutes you!

Don't now what to say Adrian... we are at awe. Salutes over salutes... so happy to have your support and kindness around this channel.

Thanks man... believe me, we are at awe of what Fincher, Messerschmidt and the crew did. So much better than what we did and also original... which makes it quite a bit harder. Very happy you see us at that level... maybe one fine day.

Glad you feel that way.... better?!?! Well, thank you... and of course I strongly disagree. Messerschmidts images take our images home after a party and never call again. No shame in admitting that... with that budget, crew, and an academy award in the pocket they better! ;-)

@@MediaDivision No shame in admiration! I am certain I have a bias for the authentic anamorphic artifacts over simulating them (simply because 90% of my compositing work is simulating anamorphics). I love the way the real rifle scope looks compared to the comped in one, since the original compositors chose to add a lot of stylized distortion to the circle of illumination from the scope. However that is an artistic choice and its purpose in storytelling is fulfilled perfectly. Everything else they did with the scope (internal reflections and whatnot) was really freaking cool.

@@zircron45 Ahhh… that explains it ;-) absolutely agree on the rifle scope there… it is indeed a mix of "too good" and "too bad" for a real scope image… beginning at the crosshair and brightness, to the totally over exaggerated distortions and reflections in the scopes barrel. I haven't seen any internal reflections like that in any scope or lens in general. All good in the context of course, I would have made it a bit more "real" by filming a real cross hair and do a post overlay, and I would have left the stupid motion tracking cross out.

What do you mean?

@@MediaDivision You deserve more views

Thanks man!

Thats the spirit! Thanks man

Glad you enjoy AnLe

Thanks Roman.... trying hard as always. Glad it is for you!

Thanks a lot... always trying to make something valuable for you.

Thanks a lot Neveragain! Glad you enjoy!

Yes... those, too. Jeff and Darius are my heroes, but the cinematography of the Killer is is more interesting in this context.

Thank a lot AK... appreciated...... thank you so much for making it possible. The division salutes you!

No, that is our MAVO LF that we also use for the tele and scope shots… the Alexa doesn't record audio when in RW mode… not worth the effort of Time Code etc. when the MAVO looks great and is also very convenient.

… and thank you so much for your support of course!!!! We salute you!!!

@@MediaDivision Looks fantastic. It's a good lighting setup to study for interviews. Thank you for the info.

@@zohairkhan5755 Thanks… it is a quite simple setup, too. One small LED panel shot through a large pop up diffusion, one tube light for the rim, and the practical in the background. No negative fill or fill light is used. The room is tiny, and you can see the door coming into frame during the lens test section.

@@MediaDivision Thanks!!

Cheers man… over the years a lot of that wine when through my liver indeed ;-)

Lord of Cinematography… hahahah … like Wayne & Garth would have said… "we are not worthy". Thaks a lot Bo… appreciated

Thanks man… we are all for it… spread the word. Although, I don't think there are a million higher end people on this platform

Thanks a lot man… appreciated. Always trying to put out something worth your time!

Thanks a lot man… really appreciate your kind words. I guess that catering to the high end makes kind of lonely in the sub department. I can't complain though, it is where my passion is.

Thanks a lot! Appreciated!!

Never gone… just can't put out something like this every month… every second month is not to shabby, right?

Nice… thats the spirit. THE KILLER is a bit on an acquired taste… the more often you watch it, the better it gets! Hope you enjoy

I did enjoy it. Excited to see what spin you put on it. I'm sure it'll be awesome as always

Happy it's for you Steven! Thanks for watching and commenting